Trott not spot

Salman Butt, Mohammed Amir and Mohammed Asif were found guilty this week on the counts of conspiracy to accept payments for identifying in advance when three no balls would be bowled in the Test match at Lord’s on 26 and 27 August last year and conspiracy to do the same acts in order to enable others to cheat at gambling. Those dates and that match are seared with the notions of cheating, fixing, conspiracy and crime.

I left Lord’s in the late afternoon of 27 August 2010 exhilarated. My departure before the close of play was for one of the few things that could ever draw me from watching a live match at Lord’s: my college old boys’ annual cricket tour. Fortunes had swung dramatically on a thrilling day, with three cricketers to the fore. But the performance of one player had topped the lot. Jonathon Trott played an innings of tactical brilliance and technical excellence. It met the force of the Pakistani opening bowlers head on, slowed and then halted their momentum, before swinging it back and trampling over their push for ascendancy, victory and a series draw.

At the start of the day, Trott had barely faced a ball by the time three partners had been dismissed. Amir was swinging the ball at pace away from and into the batsmen. He took a fourth wicket of the session, without conceding a run, leaving England five down without 50 on the board.

Trott had a plan. He batted well out of his crease to meet the ball before Amir’s late swing could bring about too much deviation. He rode the moving ball, refusing to prod at or follow it. He stood well down the wicket, towards a bowler reaching 90mph, defying the instinct to move back and give himself time. I don’t remember Trott being hit, or even troubled, by the occasional short ball that Amir could deliver.

As the conditions eased, he collected runs around the wicket, driving repeatedly through his supposedly weaker off-side. Amir took his fifth and sixth wickets of the day and Broad joined Trott. There was still a lot of bailing out to be done, but their partnership grew and grew taking England to a respectable total, then a strong one and always further from the batting travails of the start of the day. I was gone by the time the pair were lording it over the Pakistani bowlers. They were unbeaten, both with hundreds, over night. I had seen (part of) a very special day’s cricket and was so glad of the reunion that evening with cricket friends to turn it over and savour its significance.

At some point the next morning, talk of spot-fixing superseded that of Trott and Broad. It hasn’t surrendered its primacy ever since. For a short while, I questioned whether the whole England fightback was an artifice. But I had seen Trott face up to Amir and survive against his very best and then thrive as the conditions became less friendly to the bowlers.

Trott’s courage, adaptability and skill displayed at Lord’s on 27 August 2010 have not received the acclaim deserved. It was overshadowed – even questioned – by the spot-fixing allegations. Now this week’s court activity has hardened those allegations into proven criminal endeavour, it’s time to recognise Trott’s awesome innings.

Tags: , , , , , ,

About chrisps

TouchlineDad to three sporty kids; cricket blogger and coach; and the alpha male in our pride.

4 responses to “Trott not spot”

  1. downatthirdman says :

    Best wishes to you and your thoughtful blog which is so much in keeping with the way lovers of the game ‘view’ it which is why it is a pleasure to read.

    Trott’s achievement was considerable – his 184 at Lord’s in 2010 was a towering achievement, which is why the actions of Butt, Asif and Amir (and surely others) is so reprehensible. And why the England players were so angry at what had happened.

    Like you when watching that Friday’s play, Third Man happily suspended disbelief and enjoyed the achievements of Trott and Broad in taking England from 107 for 7 to 434 before Broad their mammoth partnership ended.
    Naively he thought it was just poor captaincy and wrote a piece wondering what might have happened had Chappell (who had commanded Massie’s great bowling at Lord’s on a similar day forty years before) had directed Amirs wonderful bowling that day.

    He did so because as he also wrote here at around noon on that day he had assumed that England would be out for under a hundred, the conditions were so conducive to the great talents of Aamir and Asif. Even then the disparity between the wickets taken by Aamir and Asif seemed extraordinary.

    But he was also increasingly surprised to see Butt take the foot off the England throat. He could not believe some of the bowling changes and field placings. Why no sustained attack when England were on their knees with seven wickets down? Why no third slip? Why use your two strike bowlers so sparingly with the new ball? Why take off Aamir just as Broad reached 99. (It must be concluded that there was a huge gamble on Broad making 100). Why use a part time leg spinner?

    He even thought that one even had to speculate on the missed chances (two slip chances in an over) and juvenile miss-fields.

    (Then of course Pakistan replied with 74, which which may reflect more on the war taking place in the dressing room between those in on the fix and those angry about it, than on a continuing conspiracy.)

    That is the effect of the poison that disfigures everything when trust is irretrievably lost in any area of life. And that was why England were furious.
    But they and the commentariat kept stum. Was it The Who that sang “Won’t get fooled again.”

    • chrisps says :

      Third Man,

      Trust is all. I find some consolation in believing that deliberate under-performance in sport is a career-shortening strategy. Selectors, sponsors, team-mates and fans want success and the discipline that accompanies it. Until, that is, the sport becomes ‘entertainment’ – a cautionary tale you have explored.

      Thanks for the kind comments.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: